human prostate tumor cell lines du145 (DSMZ)
Structured Review

Human Prostate Tumor Cell Lines Du145, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 199 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+prostate+tumor+cell+lines+du145/pmc08774212-36-1-13?v=DSMZ
Average 94 stars, based on 199 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Influences Prostate Cancer Cell Growth and Invasion through an Integrin α3, α5, αV, and β1 Dependent Mechanism"
Article Title: Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Influences Prostate Cancer Cell Growth and Invasion through an Integrin α3, α5, αV, and β1 Dependent Mechanism
Journal: Cancers
doi: 10.3390/cancers14020363
Figure Legend Snippet: IGF-1R (IGF1R) and pIGF-1R (pIGF1R) expression levels in DU145, PC3, LNCaP and VCaP cells. Light gray: isotype control; dark gray: specific fluorescence. Flow cytometry curves are representative for one of three experiments.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Fluorescence, Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: DU145, PC3, LNCaP, and VCaP cell growth in response to IGF-1. DU145 and PC3 cells were grown in FBS free medium (0%), in medium containing 2% FBS (2%) or 10% FBS (10%). LNCaP and VCaP were cultivated in the presence of 10% FBS. Untreated cells served as controls. Cell number was evaluated after 24, 48, and 72 h by the MTT assay. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Experiments were repeated five times. One representative experiment is shown. * indicates p < 0.05, # indicates p < 0.01.
Techniques Used: MTT Assay, Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Adhesion of DU145 and PC3 cells to immobilized collagen or fibronectin after stimulation with IGF-1 for 4 or 24 h. Mean number of adherent tumor cells from five fields. * indicates significant up-regulation to untreated control, # indicates significant down-regulation to untreated control ( n = 4). ( B ) Chemotactic movement of DU145 and PC3 cells after stimulation with IGF-1 for 4 or 24 h. Controls remained untreated. Mean number of tumor cells crawling beneath the filter membrane. * indicates significant up-regulation to untreated control, # indicates significant down-regulation to untreated control ( n = 3). All values are related to untreated controls set to 100%.
Techniques Used: Control, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: Motile crawling of DU145 and PC3 cells treated with IGF-1 (versus controls). The upper left side shows photomicrographs of the DU145 scratch assay taken after 0 (start), 8, 10, and 12 h (related to 4 h IGF-1 pre-stimulation). The upper right side shows the results from the quantitative calculation expressed as relative wound density (4 and 24 h pre-stimulation). DU145 were grown in 2% FBS. Lower panels: Relative wound density of DU145 cells following 4 or 24 h IGF-1 pre-stimulation and cultivation in 10% FBS, and relative wound density of PC3 cells stimulated with IGF-1 for 24 h and cultured in 2 or 10% FBS. Mean values of three experiments are shown. * indicates significant up-regulation compared to untreated controls ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Wound Healing Assay, Cell Culture
Figure Legend Snippet: Surface expression of integrin α and β subtypes on DU145, PC3, LNCaP, and VCaP cells. Counts indicate cell number; fluorescence is expressed by mean fluorescence units (MFU). One representative of three separate experiments is shown. Solid line = specific fluorescence, dotted line = isotype control.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: IGF-1 stimulated surface expression of the integrins α3, α5, αV, and β1 on DU145 and PC3 cells, evaluated after 2, 4 and 24 h. All values are related to untreated controls. MFU: Mean fluorescence units. * indicates significant difference to controls ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Left side: Protein profile of integrins α3, α5, αV, and β1. DU145 cells were either stimulated with IGF-1 for 24 h or exposed to culture medium without IGF-1 (Ctrl). One representative of three separate experiments is shown. Each protein analysis was accompanied by a β-actin loading control. One representative internal control is shown. Right side: Pixel density analysis of the protein expression level of DU145 cells stimulated with IGF. The ratio of protein intensity/β-actin intensity is expressed as percentage of controls, indicated by line at 100%. * indicates significant difference to controls.
Techniques Used: Control, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Left: Protein profile of cell signaling proteins. DU145 cells were either stimulated with IGF for 24 h or received culture medium without IGF (Ctrl). One representative of three separate experiments is shown. Each protein analysis was accompanied by a β-actin loading control. One representative internal control is shown. Right: Pixel density analysis of the protein expression level of DU145 cells stimulated with IGF. The ratio of protein intensity/β-actin intensity is expressed as percentage of controls set to 100%. * indicates significant difference to controls.
Techniques Used: Control, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Left: protein profile of integrins α3, α5, αV, and β1 in PC3 cells. Right: protein profile of cell signaling proteins in PC3 cells. DU145 or PC3 cells were either stimulated with IGF for 24 h or received culture medium without IGF (Ctrl). One representative of three separate experiments is shown. Each protein analysis was accompanied by a β-actin loading control. One representative internal control is shown.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Upper panels: cell growth dynamics of DU145, PC3, LNCaP, and VCaP cells after blockade through monoclonal antibodies against α3, α5, αV, or β1. Controls remained untreated. * indicates significant difference to untreated controls ( n = 4). Lower panels: chemotactic movement of DU145 and PC3 cells after blockade through monoclonal antibodies (specific blockade against α3, α5, αV, or β1). Controls remained untreated. All values are related to the untreated controls set to 100%. * indicates significant difference ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Bioprocessing
Figure Legend Snippet: Adhesion modulation of DU145 and PC3 through monoclonal antibodies against α3, α5, αV, or β1 (left: adhesion to collagen; right: adhesion to fibronectin). Controls remained untreated. * indicates significant difference to untreated controls ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Bioprocessing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Protein expression level following siRNA transfection (untreated control versus scrambled siRNA versus specific siRNA). Each protein analysis was accompanied by a β-actin loading control. One representative internal control is shown. ( B ) Cell growth of DU145 treated with an integrin α3, α5, αV, or FAK specific siRNA, evaluated by the MTT-assay. One representative of three separate experiments is shown. ( C ) Chemotactic movement of DU145 cells after knocking down integrin α3, α5, or αV. All values are related to the scrambled controls set to 100%. * indicates significant difference to controls ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Transfection, Control, MTT Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) DU145 cell number in response to integrin blockade. Tumor cells were grown in 2 or 10% FBS and in the presence or without IGF-1. Untreated cells served as controls. Cell number was evaluated after 24, 48, and 72 h by the MTT assay. ( B ) Chemotactic movement of DU145 cells after blockade through monoclonal antibodies (specific blockade against α3, αV, or β1) with or without IGF-1 activation. ( C ) Adhesion modulation of DU145 through integrin β1 blockade in the presence of 2 versus 10% FBS. ( B , C ) are related to the non-blocked controls set to 100%. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Experiments were repeated three times. One representative experiment is shown. * indicates p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: MTT Assay, Bioprocessing, Activation Assay, Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: ( Left ) Integrin subtype and FAK expression level in DU145 cells following treatment with Akt specific siRNA (versus untreated controls or scrambled siRNA). ( Right ) mTOR signaling in DU145 cells following defactinib treatment for 24 and 72 h. Controls remained untreated. One representative of three separate experiments is shown. Each protein analysis was accompanied by a β-actin loading control. One representative internal control is shown.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control



